Lowering the voting age is a separate debate worth having on its own merits, but tying it to retirement age as some kind of fairness trade-off is just lazy politics designed to sound clever on social media.
0
Should voting age be lowered to 16 if retirement age keeps getting pushed higher?
50% PRO
50% CON
Pro 5
Con 5
My nephew is 16 and a genuinely smart kid, but he's never paid rent, never filed taxes, never had to live with the consequences of a bad government for more than a school year. Voting should come with some skin in the game.
0
So if retirement got pushed to 90 we'd be handing ballots to 10-year-olds? The logic falls apart the second you poke it.
0
I was 16 once and I genuinely thought I knew everything, and I genuinely did not. The prefrontal cortex isn't fully developed until your mid-20s — this isn't opinion, it's neuroscience.
0
These are literally two separate policy questions and linking them is just rhetorical sleight of hand. One has nothing to do with the other — retirement age is an economic lever, voting age is about civic maturity.
0
We keep raising the retirement age and calling it 'necessary,' but necessary for whom? Let the generation that'll be grinding until 70 have a vote on it — seems like the bare minimum of fairness.
Research from countries that have tried 16-year-old voting, like Scotland and Austria, shows they turn out at higher rates than 18-22 year olds and vote with genuine consideration — so the 'they're not ready' argument just doesn't hold up empirically.
The whole social contract is getting rewritten — longer working lives, shrinking benefits — and the people who'll bear the heaviest load aren't even allowed in the room. That's messed up.
My daughter at 16 pays taxes on her part-time job, follows the news more than half the adults I know, and can't vote on any of it. That's just not defensible anymore.
If we're telling people they have to work until 68 or 70, they deserve a say in the policies shaping that future — and 16-year-olds will be living with these decisions for literally decades longer than the retirees voting on them.